A project report submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Professional Master in Project Management in Construction

Project (M. Eng.) - Asian Institute of Technology, 2009

In general, construction claim happen on various reasons. It is required to understand the dynamic nature between construction claim and opportunist tender. Therefore, negotiation is a significant stage in construction claim management process. Unluckily, most construction claim negotiations are conducted inefficiently due to various reasons. The recent development of multi-agent systems supplies an innovative method of facilitating various negotiations. Besides, standard forms of contract supply for extensions of time (EOT) due to excusable delays, and EOT claims are frequent in many construction projects. The contractor and the supervising engineer commonly spend important time proving and estimating such claims. However, a variety of different techniques has been employed for such evaluations. Only a small number of contractors fail to utilize some form of a scheduling device to determine the sequence of construction activities and events. A correctly though out schedule permits a contractor and owner to correctly coordinate the work with resources that are required to finish the project on time. Therefore, the cost of scheduling software is reducing and at the same time the level of complexity of the completed schedule is increasing. However, the correct usage of such software demands a basic understanding of construction scheduling concepts. The idea of delay and disruption within projects is well-known and is frequently the subject of litigation claims. However, the term is not clearly explained, and it is difficult to justify such claims within a legal process. This paper shows a well-developed method that is a reasonable, translucent, auditable and sustainable means of presenting such a claim.