Evaluation with applications of strength and compressibility characteristics of soil samples obtained by Shelby tube and split-spoon samplers in comparison with in-situ test results

By: Call Number: AIT Thesis no. GT-93-09 Contributor(s): Material type: TextSeries: Asian Institute of Technology. Thesis ; no. GT-93-09Publication details: Bangkok : Asian Institute of Technology, 1994Description: 101 leavesSubject(s): Online resources: Dissertation note: Thesis (M.Eng.) - Asian Institute of Technology, 1994 Summary: The main focus of this study are to establish correlations of strength characteristic of Shelby tube and split-spoon samples, and compare the strength and compressibility parameters derived from laboratory and field tests. Furthermore, the derived strength and compressibility parameters were used in the prediction of the stability and settlement of full scale test embankments. Samples from both split-spoon and Shelby tube samplers were tested in unconfined compression and unconsolidated undrained triaxial tests. Three oedometer and three Rowe cell consolidation tests were also performed to determine the compressibility of soil. In the field, four field vane shear tests and two screw plate load tests were conducted. The undrained strength from split-spoon samples are slightly higher than the samples from shelby tube. The ratio between Cv(field} to Cv(lab) ranges from 1. 7 to 11. The Cv values derived from Rowe cell consolidometer are in better agreement to the field values than those derived from the conventional oedometer tests. Moreover, the embankment settlement prediction was performed using the parameters derived from oedometer, Rowe cell, screw plate load tests as well as the Asaoka's graphical method. The Asaoka's graphical method fits best with the actual settlement. The settlement prediction using the derived compressibility parameters from Rowe cell agrees very well with the observed data. Oedometer yielded the most conservative prediction. Furthermore, the UU and corrected field vane undrained strengths are in good agreement with the actual strengths mobilized in the field. The corrected strengths obtained from UC tests gave a reasonable prediction of the factor of safety. Moreover, the corrected UU strengths from split-spoon gave a slightly higher prediction. Other methods from MESRI (1975) and SHANSEP (LADD & FOOT, 1974) were also considered in which both predicted the embankment stability very well.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Cover image Item type Current library Home library Collection Shelving location Call number Materials specified Vol info URL Copy number Status Notes Date due Barcode Item holds Item hold queue priority Course reserves
20-AIT Publication Asian Institute of Technology Library AIT Publications AIT Thesis no. GT-93-09 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 1 Available 30050003018859
20-AIT Publication Asian Institute of Technology Library AIT Publications AIT Thesis no. GT-93-09 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 2 Available 30050003577177
40-Archives Asian Institute of Technology Library Archives AIT Thesis no. GT-93-09 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 1 Available 30050120308258
20-AIT Publication Asian Institute of Technology Library Archives AIT Thesis no. GT-93-09 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 3 Available 30050120929657

A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree in Master of Engineering, School of Civil Engineering

Thesis (M.Eng.) - Asian Institute of Technology, 1994

The main focus of this study are to establish correlations of strength characteristic of Shelby tube and split-spoon samples, and compare the strength and compressibility parameters derived from laboratory and field tests. Furthermore, the derived strength and compressibility parameters were used in the prediction of the stability and settlement of full scale test embankments. Samples from both split-spoon and Shelby tube samplers were tested in unconfined compression and unconsolidated undrained triaxial tests. Three oedometer and three Rowe cell consolidation tests were also performed to determine the compressibility of soil. In the field, four field vane shear tests and two screw plate load tests were conducted. The undrained strength from split-spoon samples are slightly higher than the samples from shelby tube. The ratio between Cv(field} to Cv(lab) ranges from 1. 7 to 11. The Cv values derived from Rowe cell consolidometer are in better agreement to the field values than those derived from the conventional oedometer tests. Moreover, the embankment settlement prediction was performed using the parameters derived from oedometer, Rowe cell, screw plate load tests as well as the Asaoka's graphical method. The Asaoka's graphical method fits best with the actual settlement. The settlement prediction using the derived compressibility parameters from Rowe cell agrees very well with the observed data. Oedometer yielded the most conservative prediction. Furthermore, the UU and corrected field vane undrained strengths are in good agreement with the actual strengths mobilized in the field. The corrected strengths obtained from UC tests gave a reasonable prediction of the factor of safety. Moreover, the corrected UU strengths from split-spoon gave a slightly higher prediction. Other methods from MESRI (1975) and SHANSEP (LADD & FOOT, 1974) were also considered in which both predicted the embankment stability very well.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.
คัดลอกแล้ว!