<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mods xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.1" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
  <titleInfo>
    <title>Risk assessment of refuse-to-energy systems in Taiwan</title>
    <subTitle>BOT and BOO options</subTitle>
  </titleInfo>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Chang, Chi-yuan</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">creator</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Ha, Sung-Ryong</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm type="text">Chairperson</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Samorn Muttamara</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm type="text">Examination Committee</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Fujiwara,   Okitsugu</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm type="text">Examination committee</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <name type="corporate">
    <namePart>RSEA Engineering Corporation</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm type="text">Scholarship donor</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
  <genre authority="marc">series</genre>
  <genre authority="marc">technical report</genre>
  <originInfo>
    <place>
      <placeTerm type="code" authority="marccountry">th</placeTerm>
    </place>
    <place>
      <placeTerm type="text">Bangkok</placeTerm>
    </place>
    <publisher>Asian Institute of Technology</publisher>
    <dateIssued>1999</dateIssued>
    <issuance>continuing</issuance>
  </originInfo>
  <language>
    <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">eng</languageTerm>
  </language>
  <physicalDescription>
    <extent>138 leaves</extent>
  </physicalDescription>
  <abstract>In order to solve the Municipal Solid Waste problem in Taiwan, Taiwanese Environmental  Protection Agency (EPA) decided to execute the development of Refuse-to-Energy (RTE)  Plant in privatization options such as BOT and BOO. However, because of without enough  experience of BOT/BOO project in Taiwan, it is so often expected that high uncertainties can  be included in estimates and forecasts of the total project. Therefore, the total risk of the project  in the context of BOT/BOO procurement can be considerably higher than the risk of other  public projects that are procured under the public finance and general project procurement  methods. Meanwhile project sponsors who are responsible for managing, controlling, and  affording/absorbing of project can face risk at several stages due to their failure to evaluate  appropriately the project risks. It is necessary to find solutions in a comprehensive manner  In this research, questionnaire is prepared to identify the major factors as well as the occurrence  probability of major factors including uncertainty and then it is distributed to ten categories of  professions. Factor Analysis Method is used to choose the risk factors which are ranked in high  relative importance on either BOT or BOO optioned projects. One probabilistic model is used  to gauge the combined effects of multiple uncertainties as well as to provide a consistent basis  for comparing projects on different options. Risk-based cash flow analysis is used to  quantitatively assess the difference between development options such as BOO/ BOT and  different design conditions. Internal Rate of Return (IRR) is selected as the indication of  economic effectiveness in BOO/BOT project.  In development of probabilistic model, first of all, the probability densities of the uncertain  parameters which are obtained from the experts through questionnaire survey are determined.  From this qualitative approach, the stochastic model of Degree of Recurrence Risk (DRR) in  RTE system could be developed in which three major categories such as social, environmental  and financial are explained by taking into account of planning, construction and  operation/maintenance stages. Through Monte Carlo Simulation approach, which is  incorporated to the model of total DRR on Taiwanese Refuse-to-Energy system development, it  is found that BOO would create a little bit higher recurrence risk than BOT. Since the developer  with BOO option to procure RTE project has to invest huge budget to secure the land for facility  as well as to conduct EIA for corresponding project which don't be required for BOT option. It is  revealed that the environmental category would have the highest DRR and, in stages, the  planning shows the highest DRR level. By reflecting the obtained result from risk-based cash  flow, it is concluded that BOO option would create higher IRR but it would make higher risk  than BOT option. It is also found that fixed value of designed variables shows lower risk than  other cases. And the case with high growth rate of land cost even shows higher IRR value but  the risk is lower than other cases. Another result is the change of DHV has a significant impact  on IRR value in fixed O&amp;M cost than the result from fixed DHV (1,800 Kcal/kg).</abstract>
  <note>A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of  Engineering, School of Environment, Resource and Development</note>
  <note>Thesis (M.Eng.) - Asian Institute of Technology, 1999</note>
  <subject authority="lcsh">
    <topic>Refuse as fuel</topic>
    <geographic>Taiwan</geographic>
  </subject>
  <subject authority="lcsh">
    <topic>Risk assessment</topic>
    <geographic>Taiwan</geographic>
  </subject>
  <relatedItem type="series">
    <titleInfo>
      <title>Thesis ; no. EV-99-2</title>
    </titleInfo>
    <name type="corporate">
      <namePart>Asian Institute of Technology.</namePart>
      <namePart/>
    </name>
  </relatedItem>
  <identifier type="uri">http://203.159.5.9/ait-thesis/detail.php?q=B12037</identifier>
  <location>
    <url displayLabel="Full-Text">http://203.159.5.9/ait-thesis/detail.php?q=B12037</url>
  </location>
  <recordInfo>
    <recordCreationDate encoding="marc">020799</recordCreationDate>
    <recordChangeDate encoding="iso8601">20260818212802.0</recordChangeDate>
  </recordInfo>
</mods>
