<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mods xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.1" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
  <titleInfo>
    <title>Seismic risk evaluation of high-rise buildings by</title>
    <subTitle>a simplified analysis procedure</subTitle>
  </titleInfo>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Eaindra Myat Min</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">creator</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Pennung Warnitchai</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm type="text">Chairperson</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Thanakorn Pheeraphan</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm type="text">Examination Committee</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Anwar, Naveed</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm type="text">Examination Committee</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Krishna, Chaitanya</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm type="text">Examination Committee</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <name type="corporate">
    <namePart>Computer and Structures Inc.(CSI), USA</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm type="text">Scholarship Donor</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <name type="corporate">
    <namePart>AIT Scholarship</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm type="text">Scholarship Donor</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
  <genre authority="marc">series</genre>
  <genre authority="marc">technical report</genre>
  <originInfo>
    <place>
      <placeTerm type="code" authority="marccountry">th</placeTerm>
    </place>
    <place>
      <placeTerm type="text">Pathum Thani, Thailand</placeTerm>
    </place>
    <publisher>Asian Institute of Technology</publisher>
    <dateIssued>2024</dateIssued>
    <issuance>continuing</issuance>
  </originInfo>
  <language>
    <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">eng</languageTerm>
  </language>
  <physicalDescription>
    <form authority="marcform">print</form>
    <extent>93 leaves : ill.+ 1 online resource</extent>
  </physicalDescription>
  <abstract>The rapid growth in high-rise building construction in recent decades has raised concerns about their seismic safety and performance. It is essential to assess how these buildings respond during strong earthquakes to ensure the safety of occupants and  reduce potential damage. However, evaluating seismic performance is a complex task  due to the intricate nature of high-rise buildings, which consist of numerous structural  and non-structural elements, each with distinct response behaviors. Furthermore, the  dynamic behavior of these buildings during an earthquake is complex, as various  vibration modes, beyond just the fundamental mode, frequently play a significant role  in the overall seismic response. Moreover, the responses to strong seismic shaking may  exceed the elastic limits of the structure, causing damage to various components, further  complicating the assessment of seismic safety.In practice, the Non-Linear Response History Analysis (NLRHA) method is often used  to assess how high-rise buildings perform during an earthquake. While NLRHA  provides accurate results, it is computationally expensive and requires significant time,  expertise, and resources, making it impractical for large-scale assessments or routine  evaluations. This issue becomes especially apparent when conducting seismic  evaluations for a large number of buildings or in the early stages of design, where only  limited structural information is available.The goal of this thesis is to check or enhance the accuracy of a simplified method used  to evaluate the nonlinear seismic behavior of high-rise buildings with reinforced  concrete (RC) shear walls. This method is based on the Uncoupled Modal Response  History Analysis (UMRHA) and the Coupled Shear-Flexural Cantilever Beam Model  (CSFCBM). It simplifies the calculation process by approximating nonlinear seismic  responses for each vibration mode and treating each mode as a nonlinear Single Degree-of-Freedom (SDOF) system. Previous research successfully applied this  simplified procedure to four case study buildings, but the procedure had not been  verified under conditions where detailed building information is not available.This study builds on the prior work by incorporating two additional case study  buildings: a 15-story building, which is smaller than any of the buildings used in previous studies, and a 50-story building, which is taller than the largest building in the  prior research. By adding these two case studies, this research aims to test the  effectiveness of the simplified procedure under conditions where only limited building  information is available, which is often the case in real-world applications. The empirical relationships developed from the previous study, based on four case  buildings, were updated and refined by incorporating data from the new buildings, thereby improving the accuracy of the simplified procedure.The results of this study demonstrate that the improved simplified analysis procedure provides reasonably accurate seismic demand estimations for high-rise buildings, even  when detailed structural information is unavailable. When compared to the results from  the NLRHA procedure, the simplified method showed good agreement, suggesting that  it can be a practical and reliable tool for seismic performance evaluation. This improved  simplified procedure is particularly useful in scenarios where time, resources, or access  to detailed building information are limited.This research also opens up several potential applications for the simplified procedure.  It could be employed for large-scale seismic damage and loss assessments of cities or  regions in the event of a specific earthquake scenario, where quick and efficient analysis is required for a large number of buildings. Additionally, the procedure can be used to  determine earthquake insurance premiums based on risk analysis or to assist in the rapid  assessment of various seismic design options during the preliminary design phase of  high-rise buildings, where many structural details are still undefined.In conclusion, the findings of this thesis demonstrate the potential of the simplified  analysis procedure as a practical and effective tool for evaluating the seismic  performance of high-rise buildings, even in situations where detailed structural data is  unavailable. This method can be further developed and refined to increase its accuracy  and applicability to a wider range of building types, configurations, and materials,  offering a promising alternative to traditional, resource-intensive analysis methods. </abstract>
  <note>A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the  degree of Master of Engineering in Structural Engineering</note>
  <note>Thesis (M. Eng.) - Asian Institute of Technology, 2024</note>
  <subject authority="lcsh">
    <topic>Tall buildings</topic>
    <topic>Earthquake effects</topic>
    <topic>Evaluation</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject authority="lcsh">
    <topic>Earthquakes</topic>
    <topic>Safety measures</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject authority="lcsh">
    <topic>Earthquake engineering</topic>
    <topic>Analysis</topic>
  </subject>
  <relatedItem type="series">
    <titleInfo>
      <title>Thesis ; no. ST-24-28</title>
    </titleInfo>
    <name type="corporate">
      <namePart>Asian Institute of Technology.</namePart>
      <namePart/>
    </name>
  </relatedItem>
  <identifier type="uri">http://203.159.5.9/ait-thesis/Viewer/viewer.php?id=B23547</identifier>
  <location>
    <url displayLabel="Full-Text">http://203.159.5.9/ait-thesis/Viewer/viewer.php?id=B23547</url>
  </location>
  <recordInfo>
    <recordCreationDate encoding="marc">260202</recordCreationDate>
    <recordChangeDate encoding="iso8601">20260818213623.0</recordChangeDate>
  </recordInfo>
</mods>
