<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>04552nas a2200385 a 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="005">20260818214408.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">241002s20199999th a  ms tm   000   eng d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">.b12436550</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="099" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">AIT Thesis no.AB-19-03  </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Sujianto</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Socio-economic analysis of organic rice production :</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">a case study of smallholder farmers in West Java Province, Indonesia    </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Pathum Thani, Thailand :</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Asian Institute of Technology,</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">2019</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">116 leaves :</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">ill. +</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">1online resource</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Thesis ;</subfield>
    <subfield code="v">no. AB-19-03</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">A Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of  Master of Agribusiness Management in Agribusiness Management</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="502" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Thesis (M. Am.) - Asian Institute of Technology, 2019</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">In term of sustainability, organic rice farming should have socio-economic, financial, and  environmental benefit for all drivers. The study assessed the perception, motivation constraints, belief, the existing agriculture practices, factors adoption, and financial  feasibility for accelerating the adoption phase. The primary data were based on questionnaire  to organic (n=100) and conventional farmers (n=103) household in West Java Province,  Indonesia. The methods that used were descriptive statistics, independent t-test, Weighted  Average Index (WAI), logit binary logit regression, cost structure, profit analysis, Cost Benefit Ratio (CBR), sensitivity analysis, Net Present Value (NPV), Internal Rate of Return (IRR). The results show that there were different perception between ORF (Organic Rice  Farming) farmers and CRF (Conventional Rice Farming) farmers on production, quality,  health and safety, price and market, environmental concern, and certification aspect. ORF  farmers had more positive perception than conventional farmers. CRF had main barriers  which were indicated by WAI such as lower yield (0.63), risk-worries (0.70), and no cash  compensation (0.62). Whereas ORF had the very strong motivation of WAI results that were  a higher price (0.82) and their lifestyle (0.83). ORF{u2019} farmers had a lack of understanding of  GMO (Genetic Modified Organism) seed, natural fertilizer resource, self-claim certification,  and certification providers. The experiences were getting seed difficulty, unchanged  cropping pattern, having supporting institution issues, and environmental concern, however  still had a strong belief for future. The likelihood affecting factors of adoption from the logit  model results were the informal education, rice field size, fragmented land, average cost,  farmers{u2019} knowledge, and their membership of farmers group. Due to agricultural practices,  ORF had the different of their using variety, seed procurement, transplanting age, water  management system, pest control management, and fertilization technique. The ORF cost  structure was labor (66%), seed and fertilizers inputs (27%), and other (7%). ORF farming  had significantly higher differences on the revenue, fertilizers expenditure, pest control  labor, depreciation cost, and subscription fee, whereas ORF had only a lower seed cost since  they produce the seed by themselves. The ORF was more profitable than the CRF system in  line with its cost. The significant finding on financial feasibility was lucrative for farmers  but it was not feasible for the investor side. ORF had high initial investment cost and  declining yield in the commencing year which indicated by a higher NPV and IRR of CRF.  The CRF and ORF NPV{u2019}s value were US$ 975.76 and US$ 885.27, respectively. IRR of  CRF and ORF were 30% and 23% per six months.  </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Organic farming</subfield>
    <subfield code="z">Indonesia</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Sustainable agriculture</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Rice trade</subfield>
    <subfield code="z">Indonesia</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Rice</subfield>
    <subfield code="z">Indonesia</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Datta, Avishek,</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">Chairperson</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Kuwornu, John K.M,</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">Examination Committee</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Anal, Anil K.,</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">Examination Committee</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Indonesian Agency for Agricultural Research and  Development (IAARD),</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">Scholarship Donor</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="810" ind1="2" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Asian Institute of Technology.</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">Thesis ;</subfield>
    <subfield code="v">no. AB-19-03</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
    <subfield code="3">Full-Text</subfield>
    <subfield code="u">http://203.159.5.9/ait-thesis/detail.php?q=B21557</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="907" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">.b12436550</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">mnarc</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">a</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="902" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">241114</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="998" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="b">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">241028</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">m</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">h  </subfield>
    <subfield code="f">a</subfield>
    <subfield code="g">0</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="945" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="l">mnarc</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">71</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="909" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Barcode : -</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">CREATED : 2024-02-10</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">RECORD # : i13514933</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">LPATRON : 0</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">LCHKIN : -</subfield>
    <subfield code="f"># RENEWALS : 0</subfield>
    <subfield code="g"># OVERDUE : 0</subfield>
    <subfield code="h">IUSE3 : 0</subfield>
    <subfield code="i">TOT CHKOUT : 0</subfield>
    <subfield code="j">TOT RENEW : 0</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">108394</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">108394</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">MAIN</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">MAIN</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">mnarc</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2026-08-18</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">AIT Thesis no.AB-19-03</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2026-08-18 21:44:08</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2026-08-18</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">71</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
