<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>10289nas a2200409 a 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="005">20260818223212.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">170830s2014    th a  m rtt   000   eng d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">.b12189844</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="099" ind1=" " ind2="9">
    <subfield code="a">AIT Diss. no.ET-14-03</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Jakkapong Udomsirichakorn</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="2">
    <subfield code="a">A study on CaO-based catalytic tar reforming for H2-rich gas production in chemical looping gasification</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Pathum Thani, Thailand :</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Asian Institute of Technology,</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">2014</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">1 online resource (135 leaves) :</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">ill.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Dissertation ;</subfield>
    <subfield code="v">no. ET-14-03</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Engineering in Energy, School of Environment, Resources and Development</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="502" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Thesis (Ph.D.) - Asian Institute of Technology, 2014</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Global warming, climate change and energy security issues are the forces driving the fossil fuel based energy system towards renewable and sustainable energy. Hydrogen as a clean energy  carrier  is  believed  to  be  the  most  promising  source  to  replace  fossil  fuel.  Biomass  gasification  with  the  presence  of  steam  offers  a  feasible,  sustainable,  and  environment-friendly option as well as a favorable alternative for higher hydrogen yields and for large-scale hydrogen production which can satisfy the need of hydrogen in the future. However, the process suffers from the problem of undesirable CO2 and tar formation. Calcium oxide (CaO),  when  added  to  the  process,  could  play  the  dual  role  of  CO2  sorbent  and  tar  reforming  catalyst,  and  thereby  produce  more  hydrogen.  The  deactivation  of  CaO  after  carbonation  reaction  is  however  challenging  to  the  continuous  hydrogen  production  and from  economical  perspective.  The  concept  of  CaO-based  chemical  looping  gasification  (CaO-CLG) plays a key role in overcoming such a challenge.Previous studies showed that use of CaO in gasification process mostly focused on its role in CO2 capture but little attention to tar reforming aspect. Even though a limited number of works  studied  the  influence  of  CaO  on  tar  reforming  in  such  process,  a  detailed  analysis which  considers  not  only  tar  amount  but  also  tar  compounds  is  still  lacking  in  literature, especially  in  the  area  of  biomass  steam  gasification  using a  CaO-CLG  system.   The information on the operation of CaO-CLG systems is also rarely available in the literature. This study  aimed primarily at investigating the CaO-based catalytic tar reforming and the gasification performance in steam gasification of biomass for hydrogen-rich gas production in  the  CaO-CLG  system.   The  specific  objectives  of  the  study  are to:  (1)  theoretically investigate  the  gasification  performance  of  the  CaO-CLG  system  through  kinetic  rate  modeling, (2) experimentally investigate the CaO-based catalytic tar reforming of the CaO-CLG system, and (3) experimentally investigate the overall gasification performance of the CaO-CLG system.The  kinetics  model  was  developed  based  on  one-dimensional  two-phase  (i.e.,  bubble  and  emulsion)  concept  of  a  bubbling  fluidized-bed  gasifier  (BFBG)  with  in-bed  use  of  CaO. Three  sub-models  consisting  of  reaction  kinetics,  hydrodynamics  and  balances  were developed to form the kinetics model of the gasifier. The developed model was simulated through MATLAB and validated using three data groups from two experimental literatures.The  results  obtained  from  the  model  simulation  showed  good  agreement  with  those  obtained  from  the  literatures.  The  root  mean  square  error  (RMSE)  values  obtained  by  comparingthe  present  model  and  the  literatures  were  in  the  range  of  4.80{u2212}8.05.  This  indicates good precision and reliability in prediction of the model. The study on CaO-based catalytic tar reforming was conducted through experimentation on the  BFBG  of  CaO-CLG  system.  The  optimization  study  to  obtain  optimum  operating  conditions of the BFBG was first conducted and was then followed by comparative study to  investigate  the  influence  of  CaO  on  tar  reforming.  The  production  of  H2,  CO2  and  tar  influenced  by  those  studies  was  mainly  observed.  The  optimization  study  was  carried  out  by   varying   gasification   temperature (550{u2212}700&#xB0;C)   and   steam-to-biomass   (S/B)   ratio(1.47{u2212}3.41).  Results  showed  that  the optimal temperature of 650{u2212}700&#xB0;C  and  S/B  ratio  of  3.41  were  obtained.  At  such  optimum S/B  ratio,  the  highest  H2  concentration  of  63.07vol.% and the lowest CO2 concentration of 18.68 vol.% were obtained at 650&#xB0;C, while the highest  H2  yield  of  256.81  ml/g-biomass  and  the  lowest  tar  content  of  6.45  g/Nm3  were  iv obtained  at  700&#xB0;C. At  the  optimal temperature  of  650&#xB0;C  and  S/B  ratio  of  3.41,  the  comparative  study  was  carried  out  by  comparing  the  results  obtained  from  in-bed  use  of  CaO with those obtained from in-bed use of sand as well as mixed-bed of CaO and sand. Results  showed  that  14 vol.%  higher  H2  concentration,  6   vol.%  lower  CO2  concentration, and 57% lower tar content were obtained for CaO bed alone as compared to the mixed bed. Compared  to  a  bed  of  sand  alone,  20 vol.%  higher  H2  concentration,  almost  double  H2yield,  2   vol.%  lower  CO2  concentration,  and  67%  reduction  in  tar  content  were  obtained  when  a  bed  of  CaO  was  used.  The  presence  of  CaO  as  bed  material  also  brought  in  the  catalytic effect on shifting of tar species from higher (Class 1 and 4 tars) to fewer (Class 2 and 3 tars) ring structures, which resulted in the reduction of tar dew point by 11&#xB0;C and tar carcinogenic  potential  by  almost  60%  as  compared  to  a  bed  of  sand  alone.  These  were  interpreted  that  use  of  CaO  has  major  influence  on  both  technical  and  environmental  hazards of tar, apart from enriching H2 and reducing CO2. The study to investigate the overall gasification performance in the CaO-CLG system was conducted  through  experimentation  by  running  the  whole  looping  process  of  the  system.  The  optimization  study  on  the  system  was carried  out  by  varying  solid  circulation  rates  (0.91{u2212}1.14 kg/m2s)  and  then  observing  their  effect  on  the production  of  H2,  CO2  and  tar.Results  showed  that  the  optimum  solid  circulation  rate  of  the  CaO-CLG  system  was obtained at 1.04 kg/m2s. This optimum solid circulation rate allowed the CaO-CLG system, operated  at  the optimum  temperature  and  S/B  ratio  of  the  BFBG  obtained  from  previous  study, to produce the product gas with the highest H2 concentration of 78 vol.%, the lowest CO2 concentration of 4.98 vol.%, the highest H2 yield of 451.11 ml/g-biomass, the highest total gas yield of 578.38 ml/g-biomass, and the lowest tar content of 2.48 g/Nm3.  The cold gas  efficiency  of  the  system  was  also  found  to  be  46.69%,  while  that  of  ideal  scenarioobtained  from  thermodynamic  analysis  was  found  to  be  72.79%.  In  comparative  study,  a  30 vol.% higher concentration of H2, a 16 vol.% lower concentration of CO2, a three-fold increase in yield of H2 and a 96% lower tar content were found in CaO-CLG as compared to sand-based chemical looping gasification (Sand-CLG) at identical operating conditions. Compared to calcium oxide based bubbling fluidized bed gasification (CaO-BFBG) studied in previous section, the CaO-CLG allowed 15 vol.% higher concentration of H2, 14 vol.% lower concentration of CO2, almost double yield of H2, and 91% lower tar content. The product gas composition (i.e., H2, CO, CO2 and CH4) obtained from all experimental studies (objectives 2 and 3) was validated with values obtained from the developed model(objective 1) and it was found that they have good agreement. The root mean square error (RMSE)  and  the  linear  correlation  coefficient  (r)  were  0.66{u2212}8.43  (average  =  3.31)  and 0.908{u2212}1  (average  =  0.984),  respectively,  for  BFBG  study  (objective  2),  and  0.46{u2212}5.50 (average = 2.84) and 0.968{u2212}1 (average = 0.993), respectively, for CLG study (objective 3). This confirms a good reliability of the results obtained from the experimental study.To show the superiority in hydrogen production with in-situ CO2 capture and tar reduction, the  results  obtained  from  present  study  were  compared  with  past  literatures.  The  present  CaO-BFBG  was  competitive  with  past  CaO-based  gasification  in  fixed  bed  and  bubbling  fluidized bed but uncompetitive with that in CaO-based looping gasification systems. The present CaO-CLG was competitive with all of such CaO-based gasification systems in the literatures. The information obtained from the study can confirm that the present CaO-CLG system  is  one  of  the  best  gasification  technologies  for  hydrogen-enriched  gas  production  with in-situ CO2 capture and tar reduction.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Biomass gasification </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Salam, Abdul P.,</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">Chairperson</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Kumar, Sivanappan,</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">Examination Committee</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Marpaung, Charles O.P.,</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">Examination Committee</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Athapol Noomhorm,</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">Examination Committee</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">HM King HRD Project,</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">Scholarship Donor</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Asian Institute of Technology Fellowship,</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">Scholarship Donor</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="810" ind1="2" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Asian Institute of Technology.</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">Dissertation ;</subfield>
    <subfield code="v">no. ET-14-03</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="3">Full-Text</subfield>
    <subfield code="u">http://203.159.5.9/ait-thesis/detail.php?q=B00522</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="907" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">.b12189844</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">mnait</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">m</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="902" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">240418</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="998" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="b">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">170830</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">m</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">a  </subfield>
    <subfield code="f">m</subfield>
    <subfield code="g">2</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="962" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">000:001:PDF:b1218984:003336:0:0:0:0:0:0</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">Click to view Abstract</subfield>
    <subfield code="v">n</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="945" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="l">mnait</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="945" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="l">mnait</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">20</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="909" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Barcode : 30050120518963</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">CREATED : 2017-08-30</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">RECORD # : i13094725</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">LPATRON : 0</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">LCHKIN : -</subfield>
    <subfield code="f"># RENEWALS : 0</subfield>
    <subfield code="g"># OVERDUE : 0</subfield>
    <subfield code="h">IUSE3 : 0</subfield>
    <subfield code="i">TOT CHKOUT : 0</subfield>
    <subfield code="j">TOT RENEW : 0</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="909" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Barcode : 30050120518971</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">CREATED : 2017-08-30</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">RECORD # : i13094737</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">LPATRON : 0</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">LCHKIN : -</subfield>
    <subfield code="f"># RENEWALS : 0</subfield>
    <subfield code="g"># OVERDUE : 0</subfield>
    <subfield code="h">IUSE3 : 0</subfield>
    <subfield code="i">TOT CHKOUT : 0</subfield>
    <subfield code="j">TOT RENEW : 0</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">115147</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">115147</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">MAIN</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">MAIN</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">mnait</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2026-08-18</subfield>
    <subfield code="g">50.00</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">AIT Diss. no.ET-14-03</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">30050120518963</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2026-08-18 22:32:12</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">1</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2026-08-18</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">20</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">MAIN</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">MAIN</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">mnait</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2026-08-18</subfield>
    <subfield code="g">50.00</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">AIT Diss. no.ET-14-03</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">30050120518971</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2026-08-18 22:32:12</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">2</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2026-08-18</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">20</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
