<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mods xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.1" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
  <titleInfo>
    <title>Acid rain and utility planning implications of sulfur tax in the power sector of Vietnam</title>
    <subTitle>an integrated resource planning analysis</subTitle>
  </titleInfo>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Nguyen Thi Ngoc Mai</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">creator</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Shrestha, Ram M.</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm type="text">Chairperson</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Bhattacharya, Sribas C.</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm type="text">Examination Committee</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Lefevre, Thierry</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm type="text">Examination Committee</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Nguyen, Thi Kim Oanh</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm type="text">Examination Committee</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <name type="corporate">
    <namePart>The Government of France</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm type="text">Scholarship donor  </roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <name type="corporate">
    <namePart>Asian Institute of Technology Fellowship</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm type="text">Scholarship donor</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
  <genre authority="marc">series</genre>
  <genre authority="marc">technical report</genre>
  <originInfo>
    <place>
      <placeTerm type="code" authority="marccountry">th</placeTerm>
    </place>
    <place>
      <placeTerm type="text">Bangkok</placeTerm>
    </place>
    <publisher>Asian Institute of Technology</publisher>
    <dateIssued>1999</dateIssued>
    <issuance>continuing</issuance>
  </originInfo>
  <language>
    <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">eng</languageTerm>
  </language>
  <physicalDescription>
    <extent>113 leaves</extent>
  </physicalDescription>
  <abstract>Acid rain is an emerging issue in a number of Asia countries. The present study analyzes the  implications of demand-side technologies and sulfur tax as options for S02 mitigation from  the power sector.  The study examines utility planning and environmental implications of electricity generation  system expansion in Vietnam based on integrated resource planning (IRP) and compares the  same to those under traditional resource planning (TRP). A mixed integer programming based  IRP model has been used in this study to carry out generation expansion planning. The study  has found that from the long-term IRP perspective, total electricity generation, total generating  capacity addition, total expenditure and the environmental emissions would be reduced.  However, with IRP, the electricity price would be increased.  The utility planning and environmental implications are also analyzed for the introduction of  sulfur tax as a market option to mitigate acid rain causing emissions (ARCEs) in power sector  development. Four selected tax rates, i.e., US$500, 1000, 1500, 2000 per ton of sulfur (tS) are  considered. Capacity and generation mixes have shifted toward less sulfur intensive fuels and  technologies. Among introduced technology options of S02 abatement, only control  technology-FGD would be selected at tax rate ofUS$1000/tS and higher.  With the introduction of sulfur tax, an appreciable amount of S02 emission and other pollutant  emissions from power sector could be reduced. The reduction of S02 could reach to 50 % at  the tax rate of US$2000/tS. The reduction of S02 emission could take place through  technology substitution and demand-side effect, in which the dominant one is technology  substitution effect.  Through the use of integrated resource planning in power sector and RAINS-Asia model, this  study also analyzes the effect of IRP with and without sulfur tax on sulfur deposition in  several parts of Vietnam. Vietnam does not appear to suffer too much from acid rain problem  till 2020, except in two areas, the "potential hot spot area No. I" in the North and the "potential  hot spot area No.2" in the South. Both of these areas have the exceedance of sulfur deposition  density of higher than 1000mg/m 2 -year.  The present study also indicates that consideration of demand-side options through IRP and an  introduction of sulfur tax would reduce the acid rain problem significantly. The maximum  level of reduction of sulfur deposition could be made by tax is around 34% for the "potential  hot spot No.2" in 2020. It should be note that to solve the acid rain problem, sulfur tax should  be introduced for not only power sector but also all economic sectors.</abstract>
  <note>A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements  for the degree of Master of Engineering. School of Environment Resources and Development </note>
  <note>Thesis (M.Eng.) - Asian Institute of Technology, 1999</note>
  <subject authority="lcsh">
    <topic>Acid rain</topic>
    <geographic>Vietnam</geographic>
  </subject>
  <subject authority="lcsh">
    <topic>Demand-side management (Electric utilities)</topic>
    <geographic>Vietnam</geographic>
  </subject>
  <relatedItem type="series">
    <titleInfo>
      <title>Thesis ; no. ET-99-31</title>
    </titleInfo>
    <name type="corporate">
      <namePart>Asian Institute of Technology.</namePart>
      <namePart/>
    </name>
  </relatedItem>
  <identifier type="uri">http://203.159.5.9/ait-thesis/detail.php?q=B12794</identifier>
  <location>
    <url displayLabel="Full-Text">http://203.159.5.9/ait-thesis/detail.php?q=B12794</url>
  </location>
  <recordInfo>
    <recordCreationDate encoding="marc">290200</recordCreationDate>
    <recordChangeDate encoding="iso8601">20260817161436.0</recordChangeDate>
  </recordInfo>
</mods>
