<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>05167nas a2200433 a 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="005">20260817172220.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">200423s2013    th   |m rtt   0|    eng d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">.b1230752x</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="099" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">AIT Diss no.ISE-13-03</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Aziz, Muhammad Haris</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Card-Based Production Control for Repetitive Manufacturing Systems to Reduce Value Added Work in Process</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Pathum Thani, Thailand :</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Asian Institute of Technology,</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">2013</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">1 online resource (223 p.) :</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">ill. </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Dissertation ;</subfield>
    <subfield code="v">no. ISE-13-03</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, School of Engineering and Technology</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="502" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Thesis (Ph. D.) - Asian Institute of Technology, 2013</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">For Repetitive Manufacturing Systems (RMS), a common simplifying assumption used in the literature   is   to   minimize   average   Work   In  Process  (WIP),  while  achieving  maximum  Production  Rate  (PR),  which  doesn{u2019}t  consider  the  fact  that  the  value  of  WIP  increases  down  the stream of a production process as labor, time, energy and resources added to it. Moreover, average  WIP  minimization  does  not  guarantee  the  minimization  of  WIP  buildups  at  the  bottleneck. This implies a performance measure; Cost of Value Added WIP (CVAW) which is the value of WIP or the cost associated with the value that is added during the commencement of a production process. A formulation for the computation of CVAW has been developed.  Paired-cell Overlapping Loops with Card Authorization (POLCA) {u2013}   originally developed for high variety, low volume production {u2013}   has been applied to push RMS to reduce CVAW. Also, the  use  of  bottleneck  oriented  Production  Authorization  Card  (PAC)  has  been  proposed  to  minimize CVAW. For  this  reason,  generic  black  token  closed  loop  Petri  Net  (PN)  models  of  push  RMS  are  developed  for  the  PAC  and  for  the  POLCA.  Tokens  in  the  control  loops  of  all  these  models  represent card based signal for material flow control on the shop floor. Marking of these PNs is  done  through  Mixed  Integer  Linear  Programming  (MILP)  after  computation  of  semi-positive  P  invariants.  Then  simulation  is  being  done  to  obtain  the  queues  of  each  part  type  waiting  at  each  station,  during  variable  demands.  The  values  of  queues  serve  as  an  input  for  the computation of CVAW.A PN marked graph has been used for the modeling due to its ability to model asynchronous, cyclic,  live,  discrete,  and  decision  free  system.  Besides,  PN  is  a  graphical,  mathematical  as  well  as  simulation  tool,  but  computation  of  invariants  for  complex  PNs  limits  its  tractability  and  in  turn  applicability.  Therefore, a  heuristic  has  been  proposed  which  marks  the  PN  {u2013} without the need of computation of all the elementary circuits {u2013}   on the basis of server circuits, part circuits and control circuits only.  The  effects  of  these  PC  systems  have  been  investigated  on  different  sizes  of  push  RMS  {u2013} ranging from 2 part types 3 stations to 10 part types 15 stations {u2013}   against randomly generated variable demands. PAC and POLCA have also been compared with Kanban and with no card control. Results showed that the minimization of CVAW is better with PAC and POLCA than that  of  with  Kanban and  without  any  card  control.  On  one  hand,  PAC  has  the  advantage  of  simplicity  and  ease  of  implementation  to  push  RMS  over  POLCA.  On  the  other  hand,  the  structure  of  the  control  loops  of  POLCA  remains  unchanged  regardless  of  the  bottleneck  position, whereas, for PAC the structure of the control loop changes each time with the change in the bottleneck position.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="502" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Thesis (Ph. D.) - Asian Institute of Technology, 2013</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Flexible manufacturing systems</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Production Control</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Bohez, Erik L.J.,</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">Chairperson</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Manukid Parnichkun,</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">Examination Committee</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Dailey, Mathew N.,</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">Examination Committee</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Roongrat Pisuchpen,</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">Examination Committee</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Higher Education Commission (HEC) Pakistan,</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">Scholarship Donor</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Asian Institute of Technology Fellowship,</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">Scholarship Donor</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="810" ind1="2" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Asian Institute of Technology.</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">Dissertation ;</subfield>
    <subfield code="v">no. ISE-13-03</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="3">Full-Text</subfield>
    <subfield code="u">http://203.159.5.9/ait-thesis/detail.php?q=B00679</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="907" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">.b1230752x</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">mnait</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">m</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="902" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">240422</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="998" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="b">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">200423</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">m</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">a  </subfield>
    <subfield code="f">m</subfield>
    <subfield code="g">0</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="945" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="l">mnait</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="945" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="l">mnarc</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">20</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">61</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="909" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Barcode : 30050121006190</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">CREATED : 2019-04-29</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">RECORD # : i1318054x</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">LPATRON : 1012683</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">LCHKIN : 2023-11-01</subfield>
    <subfield code="f"># RENEWALS : 0</subfield>
    <subfield code="g"># OVERDUE : 0</subfield>
    <subfield code="h">IUSE3 : 0</subfield>
    <subfield code="i">TOT CHKOUT : 2</subfield>
    <subfield code="j">TOT RENEW : 0</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="909" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Barcode : -</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">CREATED : 2019-04-29</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">RECORD # : i13180551</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">LPATRON : 0</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">LCHKIN : -</subfield>
    <subfield code="f"># RENEWALS : 0</subfield>
    <subfield code="g"># OVERDUE : 0</subfield>
    <subfield code="h">IUSE3 : 0</subfield>
    <subfield code="i">TOT CHKOUT : 0</subfield>
    <subfield code="j">TOT RENEW : 0</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">15240</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">15240</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">MAIN</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">MAIN</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">mnait</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2026-08-17</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">AIT Diss no.ISE-13-03</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">30050121006190</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2026-08-17 17:22:20</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">1</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2026-08-17</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">20</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">MAIN</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">MAIN</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">mnarc</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2026-08-17</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">AIT Diss no.ISE-13-03</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2026-08-17 17:22:20</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2026-08-17</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">61</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
