02752cas|a2200265 a 450000500170000000800410001703500150005810000220007324501290009526000520022430000150027649000270029150001020031850200570042052015600047765000410203765000240207870000410210270000460214370000440218971000660223371000660229981000560236585600650242120260817161547.0030523s2002 th uu|m rtt 0| a1eng d a.b118892140 aEkvinay Sayyalath10aAdministrative decentralization to improve urban environmental infrastructure :ba case study of a secondary town in Lao PDR aBangkok :bAsian Institute of Technology,c2002 a103 leaves1 aThesis ;vno. UE-01-02 aA thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science aThesis (M.Sc.) - Asian Institute of Technology, 2002 aDecentralization provides appropriate performance of development especially administrative decentralization. It is able apply to better delivery urban services especially urban environmental infrastructure, which needs appropriate authority to respond it. Poor urban environmental infrastructure occurred from different factors. It is concerned to several conditions such as economic and social conditions. This study is to explore roles of administrative decentralization to urban environmental infrastructure. To assess potentials to establish municipal administrative authority for deal with urban services in general, for urban environmental infrastructure in specific. The study is emphasized to SWOT analysis. It is found that, in study area, it is in initiative stage, decentralization composed by both advantage and disadvantage results. However, its advantage is more than disadvantage for delivery and management of urban environmental infrastructure. Most people relied that it will bring better environment and sustainable management of urban area. However, local authority, which responds directly for urban environmental management, has been constrained due to financial and human resources are not available there. Reorganization and reallocation of responsibilities and finance are urgently needed. Moreover, political change in the country facilitates for creation of municipal government in the local area for the future. Therefore both upper and lower lines of stakeholders should contribute more participation to the local development. 0aDecentralization in governmentzLaos 0aUrban ecologyzLaos1 aPerera, L.A.S. Ranjith,eChairperson1 aZimmermann, Willi,eExamination Committee1 aSajor, Edsel E.,eExamination Committee2 aCanadian International Development Agency,eScholarship donor2 aCanadian University Consortium (CIDA-CUC),eScholarship donor2 aAsian Institute of Technology.tThesis no. UE-01-02 3Full-Textuhttp://203.159.5.9/ait-thesis/detail.php?q=B07594