<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>07535cas|a2200457 i 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="005">20260818084522.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">181197s1991    th  uzm rtt  00|  aseng d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">.b10156318</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="099" ind1=" " ind2="9">
    <subfield code="a">AIT Diss. no. EV-91-2</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Dharmappa, Hagare Bhimappa</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Computer aided optimization and design of water treatment systems incorporating particle size distribution</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Bangkok :</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Asian Institute of Technology,</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">1991</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">207 p.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Dissertation ;</subfield>
    <subfield code="v">no. EV-91-2</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements  for the degree of Doctor of Engineering, School of Environment, Resources and Development</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="502" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Thesis (Ph.D.) - Asian Institute of Technology, 1991</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Optimization models are required for the optimal design of  water and wastewater treatment systems. Although many optimization  models have been developed for wastewater treatment systems, very  few models are available for water treatment systems. However,  these works substantially demonstrate the scope for optimization  in identifying the economically and technically feasible  alternative designs. The present study is aimed at providing a  tool towards this end, which is unique compared to the past works,  as it includes:  {u2022} Integration of process optimization in system optimization  {u2022} Particle size distribution (PSD} for process design and  selection  {u2022} Membrane processes in the alternative evaluation  {u2022} Sludge treatment/handling processes  {u2022} Multi-criteria for alternatives evaluation  {u2022} Provision for easy incorporation of laboratory/pilot scale  data  Overall water treatment system design requires determination  of: system configuration, level of operation of each process, and  individual process design and operating parameters. This can be  achieved only through the integration of process optimization in  the system optimization, which provides an added advantage of  using two separate algorithms. The process optimization, which  mostly involves continuous decision variables, can be tactfully  handled with some sophisticated optimization tools like nonlinear  programming (NLP) or quadratic programming (QP) techniques. On the  other hand the system optimization, where the decision has to be  made between processes, involves discrete decision variables (and  comparatively less number of variables) which can be conveniently  handled with simple optimization techniques like enumeration.  Recently, many researchers have pointed out the shortcomings  of using nonspecific parameters like TU, SS, etc., in the design  and selection of processes. They have demonstrated the effect of  PSD on the performance of the individual processes, implying that  the incorporation of PSD could lead to optimal process design and  selection. High and stable water quality, little or no use of  disinfectant, compact treatment units, etc . , justify the inclusion  of membrane processes in alternatives evaluation. Increasing  awareness against environmental pollution and stringent  regulations on the handling and disposal of water treatment sludge  necessitates the consideration of sludge treatment in the overall  system design. Besides cost, other criteria like energy, land,  sludge production, etc., often become important in the evaluation  of various alternatives. Further, all the optimization techniques  rely heavily on the mathematical descriptions of the process/  system which are complicated to formulate. Mathematical models  alone cannot fully describe the processes. It is necessary to  (iii)  supplement the data through laboratory/pilot scale study.  Therefore provision should be made for easy incorporation of such  data.  The principal objective of the present research was to  demonstrate the importance of incorporating all the above five  features in the overall optimization of water treatment systems  consisting of six water (rapid mixing, flocculation,  sedimentation, granular filtration, and crossflow microfiltration  and ultrafiltration) and thirteen sludge treatment processes.  The review of literature revealed the lack of process models  and cost functions for certain processes. Thus the objectives also  include:  {u2022} Development of a new model for crossflow filtration  incorporating polydispersity of the influent  {u2022} Development of cost functions for crossflow filtration  {u2022} Modification of granular filtration cost functions to  reflect some of the decision variables  The software was developed for system simulation/  optimization, process simulation/optimization, and model parameter  estimation.  The cost functions developed for crossflow filtration were  from the data supplied by a French and Danish company, while the  cost data for all other processes were obtained for the USA  conditions from the literature .  Results of the process optimization demonstrated that the  design of a granular filter and flocculator is highly sensitive  to particle size distribution in the influent. The cost of a  granular filter to treat the influents with the same total  quantity of particles but with different influent PSD to the same  degree was found to vary between 12-46%. The cost was about 46%  higher for the influent with finer particles than with coarser  particles. The selection of design and operating parameters was  sensitive to influent PSD. In system optimization these cost  differences were further amplified yielding 16-64% of difference.  The system configurations, level of treatment, and design and  operating parameters were different for each influent PSD.  Further, for a small water treatment system it was found that the  crossflow microfiltration {CFMF) is an economical alternative for  some influents, which are difficult to treat with usual treatment  system comprising granular filtration.  This study is a first step towards more practical oriented  optimization modeling of water treatment systems. In this field  there is a lot of scope for further research and many potential  areas have been discussed.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Water</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">Purification</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">Mathematical models</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Mathematical optimization</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Verink, Johan, </subfield>
    <subfield code="e">Chairperson</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Vigneswaran, Saravanamuthu, </subfield>
    <subfield code="e">Examination Committee</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Fujiwara, Okitsugu, </subfield>
    <subfield code="e">Examination Committee</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Chongrak Polprasert,</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">Examination Committee</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Schroder, Hans, </subfield>
    <subfield code="e">Examination Committee</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Tebbutt, T.H.Y., </subfield>
    <subfield code="e">Examination Committee</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Japan Government, </subfield>
    <subfield code="e">Scholarship Donor</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="810" ind1="2" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Asian Institute of Technology.</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">Dissertation ;</subfield>
    <subfield code="v">no. EV-91-2</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="3">Full-Text</subfield>
    <subfield code="u">http://203.159.5.9/ait-thesis/detail.php?q=B17425</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="907" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">.b10156318</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">mnait</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">y</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="902" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">240411</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="998" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="b">2</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">951012</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">m</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">a  </subfield>
    <subfield code="f">y</subfield>
    <subfield code="g">0</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="945" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="l">mnait</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="945" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="l">mnait</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="945" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="l">mnarc</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">20</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">40</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="909" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Barcode : 30050003058228</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">CREATED : 1995-10-13</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">RECORD # : i10184776</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">LPATRON : 0</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">LCHKIN : -</subfield>
    <subfield code="f"># RENEWALS : 0</subfield>
    <subfield code="g"># OVERDUE : 0</subfield>
    <subfield code="h">IUSE3 : 1</subfield>
    <subfield code="i">TOT CHKOUT : 0</subfield>
    <subfield code="j">TOT RENEW : 0</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="909" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Barcode : 30050003058236</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">CREATED : 1995-10-13</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">RECORD # : i10184788</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">LPATRON : 0</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">LCHKIN : -</subfield>
    <subfield code="f"># RENEWALS : 0</subfield>
    <subfield code="g"># OVERDUE : 0</subfield>
    <subfield code="h">IUSE3 : 1</subfield>
    <subfield code="i">TOT CHKOUT : 0</subfield>
    <subfield code="j">TOT RENEW : 0</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="909" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Barcode : 30050160005004</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">CREATED : 2016-01-02</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">RECORD # : i12876069</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">LPATRON : 0</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">LCHKIN : -</subfield>
    <subfield code="f"># RENEWALS : 0</subfield>
    <subfield code="g"># OVERDUE : 0</subfield>
    <subfield code="h">IUSE3 : 0</subfield>
    <subfield code="i">TOT CHKOUT : 0</subfield>
    <subfield code="j">TOT RENEW : 0</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">20786</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">20786</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">MAIN</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">MAIN</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">mnait</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2026-08-18</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">AIT Diss. no. EV-91-2</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">30050003058228</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2026-08-18 08:45:22</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">1</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2026-08-18</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">20</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">MAIN</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">MAIN</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">mnait</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2026-08-18</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">AIT Diss. no. EV-91-2</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">30050003058236</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2026-08-18 08:45:22</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">2</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2026-08-18</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">20</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">MAIN</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">MAIN</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">mnarc</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2026-08-18</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">AIT Diss. no. EV-91-2</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">30050160005004</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2026-08-18 08:45:22</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2026-08-18</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">40</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
