<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mods xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.1" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
  <titleInfo>
    <title>Cost-benefit analysis of energy transmission projects</title>
    <subTitle>a case study of coal transport versus electricity transmission in China</subTitle>
  </titleInfo>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Dong, Jian-jing</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">creator</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Zhai Youg-Ping</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm type="text">Chairperson</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Edelman, David J.</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm type="text">Examination Committee</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Dang, G. V.</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm type="text">Examination Committee</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <name type="corporate">
    <namePart>Government of Denmark</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm type="text">Scholarship Donor</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
  <originInfo>
    <place>
      <placeTerm type="code" authority="marccountry">th</placeTerm>
    </place>
    <place>
      <placeTerm type="text">Bangkok</placeTerm>
    </place>
    <publisher>Asian Institute of Technology</publisher>
    <dateIssued>1991</dateIssued>
    <issuance>monographic</issuance>
  </originInfo>
  <language>
    <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">eng</languageTerm>
  </language>
  <physicalDescription>
    <extent>113 p.</extent>
  </physicalDescription>
  <abstract>This study describes a methodology for economic analysis of alternatives  of coal transportation versus electricity transmission in China. Fundamental  principles from theoretical considerations for developing this methodology are  also included.  This methodology is based on the decision criteria of project economics.  The main decision criteria are Net Present Value, Internal Rate of Return and  Cost-benefit Ratio.  A cost-benefit analysis of alternatives of siting energy facility has been  carried out based on available data from China for finding out the optimum  al tern a ti ve of energy resource transmission. Both financial and economic  evaluation are implemented. The environment impact with a energy project ls  considered due to different location of power plant. The economic benefit of an  integrated power pool with the project of electric power transmission has been  added to electricity transmission alternatives. Under fundamental assumptions,  the conclusion suggests that electricity transmission project is favored in the  study area according to the synthetic comparison and analysis.</abstract>
  <note>A thesis study submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree  of Master of Engineering, School of Environment, Resources and Development</note>
  <note>Thesis (M.Eng.) - Asian Institute of Technology, 1991</note>
  <subject authority="lcsh">
    <topic>Power transmission</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject authority="lcsh">
    <topic>Cost effectiveness</topic>
  </subject>
  <relatedItem type="series">
    <titleInfo>
      <title>Thesis ; no. ET-91-8</title>
    </titleInfo>
    <name type="corporate">
      <namePart>Asian Institute of Technology.</namePart>
      <namePart/>
    </name>
  </relatedItem>
  <identifier type="uri">http://203.159.5.9/ait-thesis/detail.php?q=B17504</identifier>
  <location>
    <url displayLabel="Full-Text">http://203.159.5.9/ait-thesis/detail.php?q=B17504</url>
  </location>
  <recordInfo>
    <recordCreationDate encoding="marc">290998</recordCreationDate>
    <recordChangeDate encoding="iso8601">20260818085305.0</recordChangeDate>
  </recordInfo>
</mods>
