<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>05041nas a2200385 a 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="005">20260818112811.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">241002s20199999th a  ms tm   000   eng d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">.b12436513</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="099" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">AIT Diss no.AB-19-03  </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Kwanhatai Thongpalad    </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Evaluation of safety and quality standards of layer farms for the production of high-quality eggs </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Pathum Thani, Thailand :</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Asian Institute of Technology,</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">2019</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">157 leaves :</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">ill. +</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">1online resource</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Dissertation ;</subfield>
    <subfield code="v">no. AB-19-03</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">A Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of  Doctor of Philosophy in AgriBusiness Management</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="502" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Thesis (Ph.D.) - Asian Institute of Technology, 2019</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">The key focus of this study was to evaluate the adoption of on-farm food safety standard by Good Agricultural Practices (GAP) certified and non-GAP certified layer farmers. The cross sectional study was conducted through the face-to-face interview with a questionnaire in 143  GAP farms and 59 non-GAP farms. The common approach used for the evaluation of food  safety knowledge, attitudes, risk perception and practices by food handlers were adapted.  The knowledge concerning on-farm food safety measures of layer hen farmers appeared to  be adequate although some misconceptions still existed. The regularities of food safety  practices adopted in GAP and non-GAP farms were significantly different. The higher level  of knowledge and positive attitudes on measures{u2019} implementation was observed in the group  of GAP farmers. However, the weak positive relationships were found, which implied the  influences of other factors to the translation of knowledge and favorable attitudes into  practices. Regarding the perception on food safety risk in egg production, half of the farmers  from both groups expressed a concern on both microbial and chemical contaminants. The  perception levels on potential sources of food safety risk were higher in GAP group  comparing to non-GAP group, partly due to higher education background and training  experiences. However, the inconsistency between risk perception and measures  implementation was still observed. The recommendation for standard promotors as well as  critical areas for the educational interventions were identified with the aim to enhance the  food safety behavior of farmers. Moreover, farmers{u2019} perspectives on the public GAP  standard and factors influencing their adoption decision were also explored. Results indicate  that the benefits of GAP standard are more recognized in the group of GAP farmers. The  public announcement of GAP campaign might not be efficient enough to attract non-GAP  adopters. The financial constraint was identified as the major challenge in the standard  implementation while the lack of understanding on GAP principle and requirements was not  perceived as an important hindrance. The binary logistic regression revealed positive  influences of farm size, farmers{u2019} access to credit, GAP training, safety and quality awareness  and the perceived compatibility of GAP standard on the adoption decision. Whereas the  choice of marketing channel through egg collecting centers negatively influenced the  adoption. Noticeably, the current market condition did not encourage farmers to participate  in the voluntary GAP scheme due to persisting problems on the oversupply of eggs and price  falling, including the price of GAP certified products. Besides, the positive consequences of  standard certification on farmers accessibility to global market was uncertain. If the  mandatory GAP standard is enforced under the current circumstances where the production  and marketing issues remain the major threats to farmers, the desirable outcome of this policy  on farmers{u2019} economic enhancement may not be obtained. Given that the farm standard is  now becoming the minimum requirement for trade, the lessons learned from Thai national  GAP standard implementation will be useful for policy makers in this region and even among  other developing countries.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Eggs</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">Production</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Food security</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Agricultural systems</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">Standards</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Anal, Anil Kumar,</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">Chairperson</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Datta, Avushek,</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">Examination Committee</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Kuwornu, John K. M.,</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">Examination Committee</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives (MOAC), Thailand,</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">Scholarship Donor</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">AIT Fellowship,</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">Scholarship Donor</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="810" ind1="2" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Asian Institute of Technology.</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">Dissertation ;</subfield>
    <subfield code="v">no. AB-19-03</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
    <subfield code="3">Full-Text</subfield>
    <subfield code="u">http://203.159.5.9/ait-thesis/detail.php?q=B21554</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="907" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">.b12436513</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">mnarc</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">a</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="902" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">241029</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="998" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="b">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">241028</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">m</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">h  </subfield>
    <subfield code="f">a</subfield>
    <subfield code="g">0</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="945" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="l">mnarc</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">71</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="909" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Barcode : -</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">CREATED : 2024-02-10</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">RECORD # : i13514908</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">LPATRON : 0</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">LCHKIN : -</subfield>
    <subfield code="f"># RENEWALS : 0</subfield>
    <subfield code="g"># OVERDUE : 0</subfield>
    <subfield code="h">IUSE3 : 0</subfield>
    <subfield code="i">TOT CHKOUT : 0</subfield>
    <subfield code="j">TOT RENEW : 0</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">41182</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">41182</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">MAIN</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">MAIN</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">mnarc</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2026-08-18</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">AIT Diss no.AB-19-03</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2026-08-18 11:28:11</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2026-08-18</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">71</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
