<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>02375nas|a2200385 i 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="005">20260817162302.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">241198s1987    th  uzm rtt  00|  a1eng d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">.b10080235</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="099" ind1=" " ind2="9">
    <subfield code="a">AIT RSPR no. CS-87-6</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Pabelico, Rafael Ramos</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Analysis of a few methods on correctness based on program structure</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Bangkok :</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Asian Institute of Technology,</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">1987</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">78 p.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Research studies project report ;</subfield>
    <subfield code="v">no. CS-87-6</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">A research study summitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Engineering, School of Engineering and Technology</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="502" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Research Studies Project Report (M. Sc.) - Asian Institute of Technology, 1987</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Verification and testing techniques have been discussed and  compared in the past from the viewpoint of their effectiveness in  determining program correctness. This paper analyzes and compares  a testing method, a formal verification method and symbolic  execution based on the structures of the programs to which they  are applied. It is shown that the program structures affect the  complexity of these methods. Also, improvements and aids to these  methods are also presented. The time complexities of these  methods were estimated based on some tree models into which  programs can be transformed.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Computer programs</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">Correctness</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Venkatachalam, Paruvachi A., </subfield>
    <subfield code="e">Chairperson</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Kanchit Malaivongs,</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">Examination Committee</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Sadananda, Ramakoti,</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">Examination Committee</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Government of Australia, </subfield>
    <subfield code="e">Scholarship Donor</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="810" ind1="2" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Asian Institute of Technology.</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">Research studies project report ;</subfield>
    <subfield code="v">no. CS-87-6</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="3">Full-Text</subfield>
    <subfield code="u">http://203.159.5.9/ait-thesis/detail.php?q=B18969</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="907" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">.b10080235</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">mnait</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">y</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="902" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">240410</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="998" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="b">2</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">951012</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">m</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">a  </subfield>
    <subfield code="f">y</subfield>
    <subfield code="g">0</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="945" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="l">mnait</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="945" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="l">mnarc</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">22</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">40</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="909" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Barcode : 30050120616809</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">CREATED : 2012-07-09</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">RECORD # : i12693923</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">LPATRON : 0</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">LCHKIN : -</subfield>
    <subfield code="f"># RENEWALS : 0</subfield>
    <subfield code="g"># OVERDUE : 0</subfield>
    <subfield code="h">IUSE3 : 0</subfield>
    <subfield code="i">TOT CHKOUT : 0</subfield>
    <subfield code="j">TOT RENEW : 0</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="909" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Barcode : 30050120238596</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">CREATED : 2016-03-24</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">RECORD # : i12909038</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">LPATRON : 0</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">LCHKIN : -</subfield>
    <subfield code="f"># RENEWALS : 0</subfield>
    <subfield code="g"># OVERDUE : 0</subfield>
    <subfield code="h">IUSE3 : 0</subfield>
    <subfield code="i">TOT CHKOUT : 0</subfield>
    <subfield code="j">TOT RENEW : 0</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">4558</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">4558</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">MAIN</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">MAIN</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">mnait</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2026-08-17</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">AIT RSPR no. CS-87-6</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">30050120616809</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2026-08-17 16:23:02</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">3</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2026-08-17</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">22</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">MAIN</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">MAIN</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">mnarc</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2026-08-17</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">AIT RSPR no. CS-87-6</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">30050120238596</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2026-08-17 16:23:02</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2026-08-17</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">40</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
