<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mods xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.1" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
  <titleInfo>
    <title>Analysis of a hybrid semantic similarity metrics' performance on different sized ontologies</title>
  </titleInfo>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Bakhtyar, Maheen</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">creator</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Janecek, Paul</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm type="text">Chairperson</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Dailey, Mathew N.</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm type="text">Examination Committee</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Phan, Minh Dung</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm type="text">Examination Committee</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <name type="corporate">
    <namePart>University of Balochistan, Pakistan</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm type="text">Scholarship donor</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
  <genre authority="marc">series</genre>
  <genre authority="marc">technical report</genre>
  <originInfo>
    <place>
      <placeTerm type="code" authority="marccountry">th</placeTerm>
    </place>
    <place>
      <placeTerm type="text">Pathum Thani, Thailand</placeTerm>
    </place>
    <publisher>Asian Institute of Technology</publisher>
    <dateIssued>2010</dateIssued>
    <issuance>continuing</issuance>
  </originInfo>
  <language>
    <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">eng</languageTerm>
  </language>
  <physicalDescription>
    <extent>51 p. : ill.</extent>
  </physicalDescription>
  <abstract>Discovering  the  semantic  similarity  of  concepts  in ontology  has  been  discussed  in  many studies with different types of approaches applied, but it does not explain and does not take into consideration the size of the ontology. If the semantic similarity methods are applied to a very huge ontology and then applied on a smaller one, the similarity metric may vary the result  of  same  concept  in  two  of  the  Ontologies.  In  this  study  this  change  in  the  results  of the similarity metric is analyzed. Analysis  of  the  ontology  can  be  carried  out  in  a  number  of  ways  e.g.  in  form  of  a  matrix, charts and graphs etc but in this study Visualization tools and plug-ins are used to visualize the Ontologies and the results. Visualization always helps to focus on the important things and discarding the unnecessary details</abstract>
  <note>A research study submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the  degree of Master of Sciences in Computer Science, School of Engineering and Technology</note>
  <note>Research Studies Project Report (M.Eng.) - Asian Institute of Technology, 2010</note>
  <subject authority="lcsh">
    <topic>Ontologies (Information retrieval)</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject authority="lcsh">
    <topic>Semantics</topic>
    <topic>Data processing</topic>
  </subject>
  <relatedItem type="series">
    <titleInfo>
      <title>Research studies project report  ; no. CS-10-03</title>
    </titleInfo>
    <name type="corporate">
      <namePart>Asian Institute of Technology.</namePart>
      <namePart/>
    </name>
  </relatedItem>
  <identifier type="uri">http://203.159.5.9/ait-thesis/detail.php?q=B01294</identifier>
  <location>
    <url displayLabel="Full-Text">http://203.159.5.9/ait-thesis/detail.php?q=B01294</url>
  </location>
  <recordInfo>
    <recordCreationDate encoding="marc">110326</recordCreationDate>
    <recordChangeDate encoding="iso8601">20260817162302.0</recordChangeDate>
  </recordInfo>
</mods>
