<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mods xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.1" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
  <titleInfo>
    <title>Operational parameters of intermittent activated sludge process</title>
  </titleInfo>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Balakrishnan, Velautham</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">creator</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Hanaki, K., Chairperson</namePart>
  </name>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Orth, Hermann M.</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm type="text">Examination Committee</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Shin, H. S.</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm type="text">Examination Committee</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <name type="corporate">
    <namePart>The Royal Netherlands Government</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm type="text">Scholarship Donor</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
  <originInfo>
    <place>
      <placeTerm type="code" authority="marccountry">th</placeTerm>
    </place>
    <place>
      <placeTerm type="text">Bangkok</placeTerm>
    </place>
    <publisher>Asian Institute of Technology</publisher>
    <dateIssued>1987</dateIssued>
    <issuance>monographic</issuance>
  </originInfo>
  <language>
    <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">eng</languageTerm>
  </language>
  <physicalDescription>
    <extent>70 p.</extent>
  </physicalDescription>
  <abstract>Experiments with synthetic waste as substrate showed that  Intermittent flow system (IFS) had better performance than Continuous  flow system (CFS) in activated sludge process. Even though effluent FTOC  was better in IFS than CFS for same HRT and COD loading, sludge  settlability was the. important parameter that gave the advantage to  IFS over CFS . This research study ascertain that IFS could be operated  without sludge bulking problem and better effluent qualities compared  with CFS, where poor settlability and sludge bulking were often the  operational problems, particularly at short HRTs and high volumetric  loadings .  IFS could be operated at HRT range of 4.74 h to 18 . 95 hand loading  range of 0.42 to 2.41 kg COD/m3 .d with F/M ratio ranging from 0 . 42 to  1.10 g COD/g MLVSS . d.  Treatability of waste with different cycle time (or different HRT)  showed that shorter aeration period such as 1 1/2 to 2 h was enough to  achieve about 92% COD removal efficiency with good sludge settlability.  Higher unit oxygen uptake rate in IFS over CFS indicated that high  microorganisms activity in IFS than CFS.  Better effluent quality of IFS over CFS indicated that intermittent  activated sludge process could be adopted to meet the stringent effluent  standard.</abstract>
  <note>A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Engineering, School of Environment, Resources and Technology</note>
  <note>Thesis (M.Eng.) - Asian Institute of Technology,1987</note>
  <subject authority="lcsh">
    <topic>Sewage</topic>
    <topic>Purification</topic>
    <topic>Activated sludge process</topic>
  </subject>
  <relatedItem type="series">
    <titleInfo>
      <title>Thesis ; no. EV-87-16</title>
    </titleInfo>
    <name type="corporate">
      <namePart>Asian Institute of Technology.</namePart>
      <namePart/>
    </name>
  </relatedItem>
  <identifier type="uri">http://203.159.5.9/ait-thesis/detail.php?q=B19239</identifier>
  <location>
    <url displayLabel="Full-Text">http://203.159.5.9/ait-thesis/detail.php?q=B19239</url>
  </location>
  <recordInfo>
    <recordCreationDate encoding="marc">011298</recordCreationDate>
    <recordChangeDate encoding="iso8601">20260818170638.0</recordChangeDate>
  </recordInfo>
</mods>
