<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mods xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.1" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
  <titleInfo>
    <title>Performance evaluation of some ordinary differential equations solvers</title>
  </titleInfo>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Kao, Chung-cheng</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">creator</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Gupta, Gopal K.</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm type="text">Chairperson</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Hosking, Roger J.</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm type="text">Examination Committee</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Malik, Ghulam M.</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm type="text">Examination Committee</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <name type="corporate">
    <namePart>The Government of the Republic of China</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm type="text">Scholarship Donor</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
  <genre authority="marc">series</genre>
  <genre authority="marc">technical report</genre>
  <originInfo>
    <place>
      <placeTerm type="code" authority="marccountry">th</placeTerm>
    </place>
    <place>
      <placeTerm type="text">Bangkok</placeTerm>
    </place>
    <publisher>Asian Institute of Technology</publisher>
    <dateIssued>1981</dateIssued>
    <issuance>continuing</issuance>
  </originInfo>
  <language>
    <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">eng</languageTerm>
  </language>
  <physicalDescription>
    <extent>81 p.</extent>
  </physicalDescription>
  <abstract>This study surveys the available software for solving non-stiff and stiff ordinary differential equations (ODEs). A survey of performance evaluation studies was made, and a performance of several ODE solvers was compared by using test package NEW DETEST. The results indicated that a variable order formula based on Adams methods could be best for non-stiff ODE if the function evaluations are very expensive. Otherwise, a code based on Runge-Kutta- Fehlberg orders of 7 and 8 is probably the best choice. On the other hand, it is difficult to choose between the two stiff ODE solvers (DSTIFF and LSODE) we have evaluated. Both solvers are quite efficient for solving most stiff ODEs.  Attempts were made to improve the performance of the two  stiff ODE solvers we have studied. Several simple changes were made to the codes and the performance of the changed codes was evaluated. We have found that overall performance of the codes can be improved by some simple changes we suggest.  </abstract>
  <note>A special study submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Engineering, School of Engineering and Technology</note>
  <note>Special Studies Project Report (M. Eng.) - Asian Institute of Technology, 1981</note>
  <subject authority="lcsh">
    <topic>Differential equations</topic>
  </subject>
  <relatedItem type="series">
    <titleInfo>
      <title>Special studies project report ; no. CA-81-2</title>
    </titleInfo>
    <name type="corporate">
      <namePart>Asian Institute of Technology.</namePart>
      <namePart/>
    </name>
  </relatedItem>
  <identifier type="uri">http://203.159.5.9/ait-thesis/detail.php?q=B21462</identifier>
  <location>
    <url displayLabel="Full-Text">http://203.159.5.9/ait-thesis/detail.php?q=B21462</url>
  </location>
  <recordInfo>
    <recordCreationDate encoding="marc">121095</recordCreationDate>
    <recordChangeDate encoding="iso8601">20260818171543.0</recordChangeDate>
  </recordInfo>
</mods>
