| 000 | 02856nam a2200409 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | 20260818214633.0 | ||
| 008 | 120399s1989 th r 0000|00eng d | ||
| 035 | _a.b10617905 | ||
| 099 | 9 | _aAIT Thesis no. EV-89-15 | |
| 100 | 1 | _aChang, Ching-lung | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | _aSolidification of heavy metals using cement and rice husk ash |
| 260 |
_aBangkok : _bAsian Institute of Technology, _c1989 |
||
| 300 | _a46 p. | ||
| 490 | 1 |
_aThesis ; _vno. EV-89-15 |
|
| 500 | _aA thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of master of engineering, School of Environment, Resources and Development | ||
| 502 | _aThesis (M.Eng.) - Asian Institute of Technology, 1989 | ||
| 520 | _aA ceme n t-silica based technique wa s us ed for waste stabilization. Ordinary Portland Cement < OPC), Portland Rice Husk As h Cement CPRHAC) are used as ce mentitious binders in this experi me nt. Synthetic wastes containing Cr, Cu and Hg are prepared in laboratory. Heavy Metal Bonding Mechanisms are points to explain the leaching behavior. types between metal and binders result trends: Cr leachability wa s higher in PRHAC and Hg leachability were higher in OPC experi ment. found to be the key The diff ere nt bonding in diff ere nt leaching than in OPC, while Cu than in PRHAC in this Cu and Hg bonding with binders is a kind of pore trapping or pores s urfaces adsorption, so their leachability we r e affected b y alkalinity, the h igh er alkalinity, the mor e leachability. Comparing OPC - based method and PRHAC - bas e d method in this study, it was found out that OPC was better immobilizer for Cr, while PRHAC was better immobilizer for Cu a nd Hg . | ||
| 650 | 0 | _aHazardous wastes | |
| 700 | 1 |
_aAhn, Kyu-Hong, _eChairperson |
|
| 700 | 0 |
_aKrienqsak Udomsinrotm _eExamination |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aVerink, Johan, _eExamination Committee |
|
| 710 | 2 |
_aROC Government, _eScholarship Donor |
|
| 810 | 2 |
_aAsian Institute of Technology. _tThesis ; _vno. EV-89-15 |
|
| 856 |
_3Full-Text _uhttp://203.159.5.9/ait-thesis/detail.php?q=B18014 |
||
| 907 |
_a.b10617905 _bmnait _cx |
||
| 902 | _a240328 | ||
| 998 |
_b2 _c951012 _dm _ea _fx _g0 |
||
| 945 | _lmnait | ||
| 945 | _lmnait | ||
| 945 | _lmnarc | ||
| 942 | _c20 | ||
| 942 | _c40 | ||
| 909 |
_aBarcode : 30050003045019 _bCREATED : 1994-05-18 _cRECORD # : i10783672 _dLPATRON : 0 _eLCHKIN : - _f# RENEWALS : 0 _g# OVERDUE : 0 _hIUSE3 : 0 _iTOT CHKOUT : 0 _jTOT RENEW : 0 |
||
| 909 |
_aBarcode : 30050003045027 _bCREATED : 1994-05-18 _cRECORD # : i10783684 _dLPATRON : 1011920 _eLCHKIN : 2000-06-11 _f# RENEWALS : 0 _g# OVERDUE : 0 _hIUSE3 : 0 _iTOT CHKOUT : 2 _jTOT RENEW : 0 |
||
| 909 |
_aBarcode : 30050120223200 _bCREATED : 2016-11-05 _cRECORD # : i1297383x _dLPATRON : 0 _eLCHKIN : - _f# RENEWALS : 0 _g# OVERDUE : 0 _hIUSE3 : 0 _iTOT CHKOUT : 0 _jTOT RENEW : 0 |
||
| 999 |
_c109347 _d109347 |
||