000 03522nas|a2200373 a 4500
005 20260817171128.0
008 100107s2009 th uu|m rtt 0| a1eng d
035 _a.b12071638
099 9 _aAIT Diss. no.UE-09-01
100 1 _aSaeed, Zaki J.
245 1 0 _aBasic services privatization's impact on urban poor :
_ba study of water supply privatization in Thailand
260 _aPathum Thani, Thailand :
_bAsian Institute of Technology,
_c2009
300 _a172 p. :
_bill.
490 1 _aDissertation ;
_vno. UE-09-01
500 _aA dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Urban Environmental Management
520 _aAccess to safe water and sanitation has been a development priority for decades and included in the MDGs. Meanwhile, privatization of water supply continues a subject of intense debate, particularly as to its effects on the urban poor. The arguments for and against it often reflect the intellectual divide along the socialist ideal and neo-liberal pragmatism. Although the literature on privatization is vast, most research has been on its macroeconomic (growth, investment, employment) impacts. This study has attempted at analyzing household level impacts, particularly on the urban poor, from an investigation of the first water supply privatization scheme implemented in Thailand since the mid 1990s. The study assesses changes in the indicators at the household level, between pre (1998) and post (2003) privatization periods, identified for this research as, access, water quality, service quality, and service costs. The study analyzes theses the changes affecting various categories of the urban poor and comparing the same with the non-poor and with technical data on access and quality. The analyses reveal that poor in each category have gained from privatization of water supply, especially access and quality, while the cost increase has not been significant. This further shows that poor, normally excluded from the public provision of service, are willing to pay to get access to good quality service and that the private sector do not distinguish household based on tenure or income status. The study also confirms that privatization can be made to work for the urban poor of a developing country if implemented in a regulated and gradual manner. It also offers clues on how the principles of cross-subsidy can be applied as part of the privatization concept and that there exists a way to make privatization pro-poor.
502 _aThesis (Ph.D.) - Asian Institute of Technology, 2009
650 0 _aUrban poor
_xWater-supply
_zThailand
650 0 _aPrivatization
_xWater-supply
_zThailand
700 1 _aAmin, A.T.M. Nurul,
_eChairperson
700 1 _aPerera, L.A.S. Ranjith,
_eExamination Committee
700 1 _aKusakabe, Kyoko,
_eExamination Committee
710 2 _aGovernment of Japan,
_eScholarship donor
810 2 _aAsian Institute of Technology.
_tDissertation ;
_vno. UE-09-01
856 _3Full-Text
_uhttp://203.159.5.9/ait-thesis/detail.php?q=B12866
907 _a.b12071638
_bmnait
_cu
902 _a240404
998 _b0
_c100107
_dm
_ea
_fu
_g0
962 _a000:001:PDF:b1207163:002617:0:0:0:0:0:0
_tAbstract--AIT Diss. no.UE-09-01
_vn
945 _lmnait
942 _c20
909 _aBarcode : 30050160059001
_bCREATED : 2016-08-22
_cRECORD # : i13051891
_dLPATRON : 1023786
_eLCHKIN : 2017-06-05
_f# RENEWALS : 0
_g# OVERDUE : 0
_hIUSE3 : 3
_iTOT CHKOUT : 3
_jTOT RENEW : 1
999 _c11030
_d11030