000 05621nas a2200421 a 4500
005 20260818223404.0
008 110102s2010 th uu|m rtt 0| a1eng d
035 _a.b12087476
099 9 _aAIT Diss. no.EV-10-02
100 0 _aChanya Pokasoowan
245 1 0 _aSulfer production via a biological sulfide oxidation process
260 _aPathum Thani, Thailand :
_bAsian Institute of Technology,
_c2010
300 _a1 online resource (113 p.) :
_bill.
490 1 _aDissertation ;
_vno. EV-10-02
500 _aA dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of requirements for the degree of Doctor of Engineering in Environmental Engineering and Management, School of Environment, Resources, and Development
502 _aThesis (Ph.D.) - Asian Institute of Technology, 2010
520 _aSulfide-containing wastewater is generated by a number of industries and anaerobic treatment of sulfate in industrial effluents by the use of sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB). Sulfide cause unpleasant odor, corrosion, damage to aquatic environment, and also process failure of bioreactors. Thus, sulfide should be removed from the effluents before discharged. Conventional physico-chemical treatments such as sulfide precipitation or addition of oxidizing agents can efficiently remove sulfide from wastewater. However, these processes consume large amount of chemicals and energy. The produced sludge is toxic and need a safe disposal. Recently, the biological sulfide oxidation by the use of sulfide oxidizing bacteria (SOB) becomes a better alternative with the advantages of lower chemical and energy requirement, less sludge production, and elemental sulfur recovery. Under limited dissolved oxygen (DO) condition, sulfide and other reduced sulfur compounds are partially oxidized to elemental sulfur which is easily removed from the waste streams. This research focused on the feasibility of sulfide removal and sulfur recovery from industrial wastewater by biological sulfide oxidation on airlift reactor. The lab-scale airlift reactor was operated under ambient condition to study the effect of sulfide loading rate and optimize the sulfur recovery. Moreover, the morphology of SOB is characterized by electron microscope and the properties of biologically produced sulfur were also analyzed. Synthetic sulfide wastewater was used as a feed and sodium bicarbonate was prepared as a carbon source for chemolithotrophic SOB. The influent flow rate was kept constant. The sulfide loading rate (SLR) was gradually stepwise increased from 0.80 kgHS-/m3-day to 4.00 kgHS-/m3-day. It was observed that sulfur was mainly produced instead of sulfate at SLR of 1.22 kgHS-/m3-day. The produced sulfur was further increased until it reached its maximum of 2.95 kgHS-/m3-day at SLR of 2.97 kgHS-/m3-day. At high SLR (> 2.2 kgHS-/m3-day), DO and pH were controlled between of 0.2-1.0 mg/l and 7.2-7.8, respectively. At SLR of 3.05 kgHS-/m3-day, the sulfur production dropped to less than 10% and sulfate became the main product with 60-70% of influent sulfide conversion. It was found that sulfur production had tendency to increase again at SLR of 3.33 kgHS-/m3-day. The accumulation of produced sulfur in the reactor reduced the contact of aqueous sulfide and the bacterial cells, thus, reducing the conversion of sulfide to sulfur. More recovered sulfur was produced at high sulfide loading rate due to the change of metabolic pathway of SOB which prevented the toxicity of sulfide in the culture. The airlift reactor successfully removed sulfide over 90% of the influent sulfide during the steady state operation. The produced elemental sulfur was analyzed by X-Ray diffraction (XRD) analyzer. The XRD pattern showed the elemental sulfur (S8) with orthorhombic structure. All peaks of the sample resemble S8 and most peaks matched with the commercial sulfur and analytical-grade sulfur. The biologically produced sulfur also contained organic compounds which were confirmed by the result from elemental analyzer. The percentage of carbon, nitrogen, and hydrogen are 4.44%, 0.79% and 0.48% respectively.
650 0 _aSulphides
_xOxidation
700 1 _aAnnachhatre, Ajit P.,
_eChairperson
700 0 _aChongrak Polprasert,
_eExamination Committee
700 0 _aVilas Nitivattananon,
_eExamination Committee
710 2 _aAIT scholarship,
_eScholarship donor
810 2 _aAsian Institute of Technology.
_tDissertation ;
_vno. EV-10-02
856 _3Full-Text
_uhttp://203.159.5.9/ait-thesis/detail.php?q=B00558
907 _a.b12087476
_bmnait
_cu
902 _a240329
998 _b0
_c110102
_dm
_ea
_fu
_g0
962 _a000:001:PDF:b1208747:000246:0:0:0:0:0:0
_tAbstract-AIT Diss. no.EV-10-02
_vn
945 _lmnait
945 _lmnait
945 _lmnarc
942 _c20
942 _c40
909 _aBarcode : 30050120553838
_bCREATED : 2011-02-01
_cRECORD # : i12651758
_dLPATRON : 0
_eLCHKIN : -
_f# RENEWALS : 0
_g# OVERDUE : 0
_hIUSE3 : 0
_iTOT CHKOUT : 0
_jTOT RENEW : 0
909 _aBarcode : 30050120553812
_bCREATED : 2011-02-01
_cRECORD # : i1265176x
_dLPATRON : 0
_eLCHKIN : -
_f# RENEWALS : 0
_g# OVERDUE : 0
_hIUSE3 : 0
_iTOT CHKOUT : 0
_jTOT RENEW : 0
909 _aBarcode : 30050160004114
_bCREATED : 2016-09-02
_cRECORD # : i12879150
_dLPATRON : 0
_eLCHKIN : -
_f# RENEWALS : 0
_g# OVERDUE : 0
_hIUSE3 : 0
_iTOT CHKOUT : 0
_jTOT RENEW : 0
999 _c115770
_d115770