| 000 | 04871nam a2200457 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | 20260818095255.0 | ||
| 008 | 130598 th eng | ||
| 035 | _a.b11698974 | ||
| 099 | 9 | _aAIT Thesis no.AE-96-37 | |
| 100 | 1 | _aGautam, Anand Kumar | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | _aEffects of lime and phosphate on mungbean and groundnut in irrigated acid sulphate soils |
| 260 |
_aBangkok : _bAsian Institute of Technology, _c1996 |
||
| 300 |
_a135 leaves + _e1 online resource |
||
| 490 | 1 |
_aThesis ; _vno. AE-96-37 |
|
| 500 | _aA thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science | ||
| 502 | _aThesis (M.Sc.) - Asian Institute of Technology, 1996 | ||
| 520 | _aA field experiment was conducted on irrigated acid sulphate soil (Sulfic tropaquept) of Bangkok Plain at Asian Institute of Technology during the dry season of 1996 in order to investigate the effect of lime and phosphorous on soil pH and on growth, yield, nutrient concentration of mungbean (Vigna radiata L. WilczeK) and Groundnut (Arachis hypogea L.) and to simulate groundnut yield using PNGROW model and together with CERES-rice model analyze possible double cropping pattern. The experiment was laid out in split plot design with three replications with three levels of lime (0, 5 and 10 t ha-1) as main plots and three levels of phosphorous (0, 50 and 100 kg P2O5 ha-1) as sub plots. In soil, application of lime significantly increased pH. Liming increased exchangeable Ca and Mg in soil. Soil pH, available P and exchangeable Ca and Mg of underneath layer were not influenced by liming at upper layer. Bray II P increased with added lime and phosphorous at the zone of incorporation. Liming significantly increased the plant height, rooting depth, pods per plant, seed yield and total dry matter yield of mungbean. Lime had non-significant effect on plant height and seed yield of groundnut. Ca concentration was significantly higher in the seeds of both crops in the limed plots than unlimed plots. Application of phosphorous increased the plant height, seed yield and total dry matter yield of mungbean reflecting to be limiting nutrient. Its effect was non-significant to groundnut seed yield. Significant higher P concentration in straw and seeds of both crops and total P uptake was observed due to phosphorous application. A second-order polynomial regression revealed positive relationship between total N, P and K uptake and total dry matter (straw and seed) yield of both crops. The relationship between total Ca and Mg uptake and total dry matter yield was more pronounced in mungbean. Comparing to these two crops, total nutrients uptake were more limit in mungbean than in groundnut. In economic term, control treatment (L0P 0) required lowest variable cost in both crops. First level of phosphorous in mungbean and second level in groundnut without lime gave highest net returns. Marginal rate of net return in both crops were highest in the treatment with first level of phosphorous without lime. Compared to groundnut, mungbean gave higher marginal rate of net return in this treatment combination. No differences were found in between simulated and experimental results in seed yield, flowering and maturity days, nitrogen concentration in seeds and straw of groundnut. The model PNGROW and CERES-rice used in optimization of planting date in a irrigated double cropping system of rice and groundnut showed high degree of reliability. | ||
| 650 | 1 | 0 | _aLiming of soils |
| 650 | 1 | 0 |
_aMung bean _xSoils |
| 650 | 1 | 0 |
_aPeanuts _xSoils |
| 700 | 1 |
_aHansen, Gunner K., _eChairperson |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aTinsley, Richard L., _eExamination committee |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aSalokhe, Vilas M., _eExamination Committee |
|
| 700 | 0 |
_aBoonjit Titapiwatanakun, _eExamination committee |
|
| 710 | 2 |
_aUnited States Agency for International Development (USAID), _eScholarship donor |
|
| 710 | 2 |
_aCHEMONICS International, _eScholarship donor |
|
| 810 | 2 |
_aAsian Institute of Technology. _tThesis ; _vno. AE-96-37 |
|
| 856 |
_3Full-Text _uhttp://203.159.5.9/ait-thesis/detail.php?q=B14588 |
||
| 907 |
_a.b11698974 _bmnait _cy |
||
| 902 | _a240403 | ||
| 998 |
_b0 _c980319 _dm _ea _fy _g0 |
||
| 945 | _lmnait | ||
| 945 | _lmnait | ||
| 945 | _lmnarc | ||
| 942 | _c20 | ||
| 942 | _c40 | ||
| 909 |
_aBarcode : 30050120577431 _bCREATED : 1996-10-20 _cRECORD # : i12057642 _dLPATRON : 0 _eLCHKIN : - _f# RENEWALS : 0 _g# OVERDUE : 0 _hIUSE3 : 0 _iTOT CHKOUT : 0 _jTOT RENEW : 0 |
||
| 909 |
_aBarcode : 30050120577423 _bCREATED : 1996-10-20 _cRECORD # : i12057654 _dLPATRON : 1012360 _eLCHKIN : 2000-02-19 _f# RENEWALS : 0 _g# OVERDUE : 0 _hIUSE3 : 0 _iTOT CHKOUT : 7 _jTOT RENEW : 6 |
||
| 909 |
_aBarcode : 30050120372502 _bCREATED : 2016-02-06 _cRECORD # : i13011388 _dLPATRON : 0 _eLCHKIN : - _f# RENEWALS : 0 _g# OVERDUE : 0 _hIUSE3 : 0 _iTOT CHKOUT : 0 _jTOT RENEW : 0 |
||
| 999 |
_c35210 _d35210 |
||