000 05100nas a2200421 a 4500
005 20260818100222.0
008 080929s2007 th uu|m rtt 0| a1eng d
035 _a.b12039950
099 0 _aAIT Thesis no.NR-07-17
100 1 _aGyamtsho, Thinley
245 1 0 _aEnvironmental conservation policy in Bhutan :
_bimpacts and implication on rural livelihood & natural resources
260 _aPathum Thani, Thailand :
_bAsian Institute of Technology,
_c2007
300 _a136 p. :
_bill.
490 1 _aThesis ;
_vno. NR-07-17
500 _a A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science, School of Environment, Resources and Development
502 _aThesis (M.Sc.) - Asian Institute of Technology, 2007
520 _aThe purpose of conservation is to ensure continuous human welfare from the natural environment. In reality it has provided a tool to legitimize for those who are in power to control the resources often at the cost of social welfare of the common people who are powerless. Conservation history in third world was not of a happily shared interest between rural people and the state conservation bodies wherein the local resource users were considered as an unnatural presence and cause disturbance to ecological equilibrium by their grazing animals, hunting lifestyles, and shifting cultivation practices. While on the other hand tourist with cameras, hotel proprietors and tour operators, scientist and big game hunters were allowed. Bhutan already had more than 64% of the country's area under forest cover, while arable agriculture land constituted only 8%. Although, modem form of conservation started late in 1970s, in Bhutan has managed to allocate 39% of the country under the protected area system by 2004 (NCD, 2004) through the creation conservation areas. Its diverse ecosystems are endemic to more than 5,400 species of vascular plants, 770 species of birds and 170 species of mammals are known as the crown jewels of the Eastern Himalayas-a region recognized as a global biodiversity hotspot. Intention of this study was to assess socioeconomic benefits of environmental conservation policy by explaining the rural livelihood characteristics in five study villages in three Dzongkhags. The study revealed that on the average 35% of the arable land is being fallow mainly due to the crop damage by wildlife, lack of labour to guard crop, and policy restrictions on landuse (overage Tseri). Within the cultivated area 45% of the production was damaged by wildlife despite allocating 29% of effective labour for guarding crops and doing protection works annually. In the study villages 14% of the households had one room, 60% of HH were temporary structure, and 85% of the household were older than thirty years indicating poor housing condition due to poor socioeconomic condition. The study concluded that despite enormous benefit environmental conservation policy has help to achieved at the national level, it had not benefited directly 70% of the country's population who are staying in rural area. Rather rural farmers are enduring untold socioeconomic loss by having to restrict entitlements to their livelihood sources for the purpose of environmental conservation. This has resulted in increasing incidence of food deficit and poverty forcing 44% of the household in Kenmong to migrate to urban centres. This explains why the rural area has higher incidence of poverty rate of 38.3% compared to only 4.3% in urban area (NSB-RGoB, 2004). Study recommends that there is a need to institute cost and benefit sharing mechanism if the intention of environmental conservation policy is to ensure the welfare of all citizens. This will provide basis for realizing the most cherish goal GNH.
650 0 _aConservation of natural resources
_zBhutan
700 1 _aShivakoti, Ganesh P.,
_eChairperson
700 1 _aSchmidt-Vogt, Dietrich,
_eExamination Committee
700 1 _aWebb, Edward L.,
_eExamination Committee
710 2 _aCouncil for RNR Research of Bhutan,
_eScholarship donor
710 2 _aSwiss Development Corporation,
_eScholarship donor
810 2 _aAsian Institute of Technology.
_tThesis ;
_vno. NR-07-17
856 _3Full-Text
_uhttp://203.159.5.9/ait-thesis/detail.php?q=B03472
907 _a.b12039950
_bmnait
_cu
902 _a240401
998 _b0
_c080929
_dm
_ea
_fu
_g0
945 _lmnait
945 _lmnait
945 _lmnarc
942 _c20
942 _c40
909 _aBarcode : 30050120822837
_bCREATED : 2008-09-29
_cRECORD # : i1257465x
_dLPATRON : 1021177
_eLCHKIN : 2010-01-27
_f# RENEWALS : 0
_g# OVERDUE : 0
_hIUSE3 : 0
_iTOT CHKOUT : 4
_jTOT RENEW : 2
909 _aBarcode : 30050120822845
_bCREATED : 2008-09-29
_cRECORD # : i12574661
_dLPATRON : 1026970
_eLCHKIN : 2018-03-05
_f# RENEWALS : 0
_g# OVERDUE : 0
_hIUSE3 : 1
_iTOT CHKOUT : 2
_jTOT RENEW : 4
909 _aBarcode : 30050160007885
_bCREATED : 2016-03-18
_cRECORD # : i1289929x
_dLPATRON : 0
_eLCHKIN : -
_f# RENEWALS : 0
_g# OVERDUE : 0
_hIUSE3 : 0
_iTOT CHKOUT : 0
_jTOT RENEW : 0
999 _c38911
_d38911