000 03513nam a2200397 4500
005 20260818112807.0
008 280898 th eng
035 _a.b10261230
100 0 _aBui Khanh Huong
245 1 0 _aEvaluation of regression methods in flow forecasting
260 _aBangkok :
_bAsian Institute of Technology,
_c1988
300 _a66 p.
490 1 _aThesis ;
_vno. CS-88-4
500 _aA thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Master of Science, School of Engineering and Technology
502 _aThesis (M.Sc.) - Asian Institute of Technology, 1988
520 _aIn this thesis a system is developed for daily flow forecasting consisting o f five regression methods: - The Least Squares Method, - The Ridge Regression , - The Principal Component Regression, - The Stepwise Regression, a nd - The regression with minimum s um of absolute errors. The system was used to evaluate the performances of the regression techniques and of the following models: - The - The - The - The model involving discharge, rainfall and evaporation, mode l using only discharge and rainfall, Linear Perturbation Mode l, a nd Extended Linear Perturbation Model. From applications to data on two catchment areas , in Laos and Th ail and , it was found that: - The performances of the least squares method, the stepwise regression and the regression with minimum sum of absolute errors are almost the same. But the regression with mini mum sum of absolute errors requires mu c h more executing time. - The performance of the ridge regression is not as good as that of the least squares method in the case of nonsingular matrix . The ridge regression is recommended for use only when the least squares method cannot give the results because of the multicollinearity present among the predictor variables. - The performance of the principal component regression is a l so not as good as that of the least squares method. - The performances of the model involving discharge, rainfall and evaporation , the model using only discharge and rain fall, and the Extended Linear Perturbation Model are almost t he same. - The performance of the model using only discharge and rainfall is better than that of the Linear Perturbation Model.
650 0 _aHydraulics
_xMathematical models
700 1 _aHuynh, Ngoc Phien,
_eChairperson
700 1 _aBogardi, Janos J.,
_eExamination Committee
700 1 _aGonzales, Jr. R. L.,
_eExamination Committee
710 2 _aJapanese Government,
_eScholarship Donor
810 2 _aAsian Institute of Technology.
_tThesis ;
_vno. CS-88-4
856 _3Full-Text
_uhttp://203.159.5.9/ait-thesis/detail.php?q=B18762
907 _a.b10261230
_bmnait
_cx
902 _a240401
998 _b2
_c951012
_dm
_ea
_fx
_g0
945 _lmnait
945 _lmnait
945 _lmnarc
942 _c20
942 _c40
909 _aBarcode : 30050003148326
_bCREATED : 1994-05-17
_cRECORD # : i10321226
_dLPATRON : 0
_eLCHKIN : -
_f# RENEWALS : 0
_g# OVERDUE : 0
_hIUSE3 : 0
_iTOT CHKOUT : 0
_jTOT RENEW : 0
909 _aBarcode : 30050003148334
_bCREATED : 1994-05-17
_cRECORD # : i10321238
_dLPATRON : 1013182
_eLCHKIN : 2000-10-11
_f# RENEWALS : 0
_g# OVERDUE : 0
_hIUSE3 : 1
_iTOT CHKOUT : 1
_jTOT RENEW : 0
909 _aBarcode : 30050120373575
_bCREATED : 2016-08-06
_cRECORD # : i13023597
_dLPATRON : 0
_eLCHKIN : -
_f# RENEWALS : 0
_g# OVERDUE : 0
_hIUSE3 : 0
_iTOT CHKOUT : 0
_jTOT RENEW : 0
999 _c41168
_d41168